Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Mid-year Robo Advisor report

Depositphotos_25142857_s-2015By Aman Raina, Sage Investors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

When we last checked in with our ROBO (Robo-adviser) portfolio in January it was taking some hits along with the overall stock market. Since then the market has recovered quite nicely. Let’s see if the Robo Portfolio has bounced back.

Performance

Back in the green!

Back in the green!

After being underwater in January, the ROBO portfolio has bounced back and is now in the green again. Year to date in 2016 it is up 2.28 per cent. Since my ROBO started investing in January 2015, my portfolio is up 2.7 per cent. Since the January correction, ROBO is up about 5 percent. Back in January, almost every asset class was losing money. Now we’re seeing some more green shoots. The Real Estate asset class which was down almost 15 per cent in January is now down 3.8 per cent.

The dividend ETF, which was down 5.4 per cent in January, is now up 3.2 %. The Canadian ETF that was tanking in January as oil and commodity prices were free falling is now down only 2 per cent. It appears the ETFs have been participating in the rebound of the past few months, which is what we want to see.

UPDATE-July 18 2016:

Since I took this snapshot in June, the markets have been on a roller coaster. After Brexit the portfolio, like the market, took a direct left hook. However. like the markets, it recovered quite nicely and is now back in the black. As of July 18, my ROBO portfolio was up 4.6% year to date and 4.9% since inception. A little more palatable.

The portfolio has risen nicely the past few months as the market recovered from the January correction

The portfolio has risen nicely the past few months as the market recovered from the January correction

Transactions

In the last few months, the ROBO service has made some back-office changes in how they execute and process transactions, which is supposed to make the process more efficient and ensures I get the best prices for my orders. They are using a new service and I was asked to provide authorization to transfer the assets to the new provider. When I checked on the transacation page, I was at first surprised to see the page filled with all kinds of transactions, but it was really administrative moves to formally transfer the assets. Besides that there were no sell transactions that involved a rebalancing or recalibration of the portfolio, which is good to see. ROBO made only two buy trades. It added to the positions in the Vanguard US Equity ETF and the Emerging Market ETF.

 

So far it seems the ROBO is not trying to churn or turn over the portfolio. It is keeping the allocations tight within the predefined amounts and tweaking them at the margin. This seems reasonable.

Another reason why the portfolio has bounced back is that the portfolio has been picking up dividends on the way. Since January, the portfolio has earned $37.57 in dividends.

Other observations

My only correspondences with my ROBO continue to be through email. Since January 2015, I’ve yet to speak to a human being.

The Up-sell Begins

My ROBO reached out to me a couple of times and on both occasions it was to offer me something.

In the first instance it was this opportunity:

ROBO pressing my emotional, do-good for Mother Earth buttons

ROBO pressing my emotional, do-good for Mother Earth buttons

It appears the ROBO service I am using is branching out beyond generic portfolio management. The margins perhaps are too razor thin? In a recent email I was informed about a new type of portfolio that is geared towards investing in Socially Responsible companies that are trying to make the world a better place. The service would invest in a basket of ETFs that would track broad-market Socially Responsible indexes (SRI). Below is a breakdown of ROBO’s SRI portfolio

My Robo's Socially Responsible portfolio offering

My Robo’s Socially Responsible portfolio offering

Some notes:

  • They were pretty upfront and detailed into what specific ETFs would be used, as well as the MER costs.
  • They were also upfront that yes this will cost you more than what you’re paying in your current portfolio. We’re talking about another 0.15 basis points, but if you layer additional “value-added” products over a long period of time, it can add up and eat away at your savings.

One of the failures of investors is people take a carefully designed portfolio and “tweak” it to add new products and securities that they either heard about from someone or that their adviser pitched to them. People think they’re not altering their portfolio much, but with a tweak here and a tweak there, you can end up with a dramatically different portfolio that may not get you the results you want.

This is the first time my ROBO has pitched me on tweaking  or adding to my portfolio. The reality is it’s trying to upsell me to a higher-cost product that may or may not be in my best interest. ROBO is clearly going after the Millennial crowd and appealing to their yearning to make the world a better place. It may very well succeed. Whether the customer benefits is like almost everything with this robo-adviser model, up for debate.

Cramping my space

One of the services my practice offers is analyzing portfolios and providing input on whether they are in alignment with the client’s overall investment plan. It’s not a huge component of my practice, but I get a few people here and there looking for a third party, unbiased assessment and I’m happy to help them.  So as I was thumbing through Twitter, I caught note of a Tweet from my ROBO indicating that it is introducing a portfolio review service that does the following (I’ve removed references to the actual ROBO service):

“one of (ROBO’s) resident financial geniuses will look at your entire financial picture and give you a diagnosis and, using a methodology based on Nobel Prize–winning academic research, some simple, actionable, and really good advice….”

And oh yes … it’s free. Talk about eating into my gig.

As much as my initial thought was I’ve just been disrupted — by Nobel Prize winning people no less — I’ll admit that free is catchy and free will bring in a lot of people to the ROBO and not to me. Again, disruptive feelings are entering my space. They seem to hitting all the notes I hit in my service offering, evaluating costs, making sure assets are not too concentrated domestically … good things. The premise seems quite appealing.

Then I came to this piece on execution:

“…Before we can give you advice, we’ll have to know all the details. We understand you might be shy. But we assure you that it’s totally safe, private, and completely judgment-free! All you do is upload your investment account statements. Then one of our portfolio managers—an actual human!—will comb through them and do a comprehensive, personalized analysis. Once that’s happened, you’ll set up a call with your ROBO portfolio manager and he or she will go over what we’ve learned. After that, the lines of communication are wide open if you want to talk more. You’ll even have your portfolio manager’s personal cellphone number in case you have a question about RRSPs (or fantasy football)…”

This is where it gets tricky. ROBO is asking someone to upload personal financial information to a company with which they have no business relationship. So many questions enter my head. How secure is it? Besides reading my statements and analyzing them, what else are they doing with my personal information? Are they building a database? Will they be using this data to curate and sell me products like that Socially Responsible Portfolio above?

The whole thing has a Facebooky feel to it. The more info you provide, the more the ROBO can build up a profile of people like you and potentially target products … higher priced products, that may or may not be in your best interest. It has a sort of bait-and-switch where they lure you in with free and then have a captive audience to sell you their service.

We’ve been interviewing contractors the last few months for some reno work we would like to do on our house: every contractor that comes in has told us the previous people who did our kitchen or painted the place or laid the roofing down did a horrible job and that they would never do anything like that. This narrative I suspect is something of a tone I’d expect to hear from the ROBO if it looked at my financial portfolio. I wouldn’t be surprised if they said their methodology is vastly superior than anything I or my own adviser has come up with.

Having said that, I’d be quite curious to see what my ROBO thinks of my finances. I’ll have to ponder that.

In the case of my own portfolio evaluation service, I look at client investment information but after I’ve worked with the client I delete it, shred it, or even return the statements to the client. I’m not going to lie, I am going to introduce them to my company’s value proposition and see if there is opportunity to further work together; however, my value proposition revolves around teaching and education. I’m not selling an ETF or stock or mutual fund or target wrapped account. I’m selling my time to help them become more financially savvy with investing their hard earned money. I can’t compete with free and I won’t compete with free. My time is valuable and I, like any other self-respecting person or entity, would expect to be appropriately compensated for the work effort put into it.

I never really thought about how these type of services could up-sell me. I have been focussing more on the mechanics of how the ROBO service is investing my money. But as I can see with my experience, it appears this up-selling program is a very central component of their business model, no different from a cell-phone company or a cable company or a traditional bank. Get them in with cheap fees but then move them up the fee scale.  I will be playing close attention to how ROBO continues to try to upsell me and convince me to tweak my portfolio or even to get me to switch teams. It’s a dynamic that I don’t see getting discussion and of which investors should be cognisant.

AmanRainaAman Raina, MBA is an Investment Coach and founder of Sage Investors, an independent practice specializing in investment coaching and portfolio analysis services. This blog was originally published on his website on June 27 and is reproduced  here with permission. 

 

 

Canada ranks 10th in global Retirement Security

Global investments and international finance business symbol with four blue eggs with the maps of the world in a nest as a concept of savings and money management in many regions as Asia North America Europe and Latin America.While it ranks ahead of the United States and the United Kingdom, Canada ranks in tenth place in a global retirement security survey being released today (Tuesday).

Several countries in northern Europe and Scandinavia rank higher in the study by Natixis Global Asset Management. Norway is number one, followed by Switzerland and Iceland. However, because of a revised methodology, Canada’s 2015 ranking is two spots higher than under the 12th place spot it had under the survey’s older methodology. The Natixis Global Retirement Index was introduced in 2013, and bases its overall retirement security scores on four factors affecting the lives of retirees.

A central component is of course finances but three sub-indices measure well being, health and quality of life, providing a more holistic view of retirement than mere financial considerations.

Low interest rates a drawback for Canadian retirees

Continue Reading…

Why would anyone hold a bond with a negative yield?

graham-bodel
Graham Bodel

By Graham Bodel, CFA, Chalten Advisors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

We recently highlighted that now more than $10 trillion of government debt was trading at a negative yield.  We mentioned it again in the Chalten Q2 Investment Review and have received a number of questions asking why anyone would ever hold a bond that would pay them back less than they invested.  Why not just hold cash instead?

While it does seem bizarre at first there are both risk-related and practical reasons why investors might hold negative-yielding bonds instead of cash and some other reasons negative yielding bonds might still have value for investors.

Risk related / practical reasons for holding negative yielding bonds over cash

  1. Just to get this one off the table right away, it is simply not practical or safe to hold cash physically, in a safe, under the mattress or buried in the back yard in mason jars!
  2. Fortunately, the above options aren’t necessary as we have banks. However, there are definitely times where the safety and security of specific banks or the banking system in general is called into question.  We can’t really relate here in Canada but living in Hong Kong in 1997/1998 and in the UK in 2008/2009, the topic came up quite regularly; by the end of the most recent financial crisis a lot of the UK banking system was effectively nationalized (nobody lost any deposits).  For large depositors like institutional investors, keeping money in the form of bank deposits simply isn’t practical or prudent.
  3. Certain institutions, such as insurance companies, are required to hold specific asset classes.  So some may not have a choice but to hold certain government bonds with negative yields.

Other reasons why negative yielding bonds might still have value for investors

  1. While certain governments’ bonds might currently be posting negative yields, an investor might still want bond exposure in that particular currency.  For example, some global investors often think of the Swiss franc or Japanese yen as “safe haven” currencies.  10-year government bonds from those two countries currently have a negative yield.  Perhaps the premium reflects current demand levels for safe haven currencies.
  2. If an investor feels yields are going to fall even further, they might be expecting to receive further gains from bonds, even if current yields are negative.
  3. In a deflationary environment, a bond with a negative nominal yield, could still give you a positive real (inflation adjusted) return.  Ultimately investors care about real returns.
  4. Perhaps most importantly, bonds are not just return generators – their principal role in an investor’s portfolio should be to act as an uncorrelated shock-absorber when stock returns turn negative.  According to Vanguard, current correlations between stocks and bonds are at records lows (see: By this metric, bonds have never been more valuable).

I’m sure there are more reasons.  Yes, it still seems strange; however, investors have gotten a little too used to thinking of bonds being return-generators or growth assets.  Taken for what they really are, an investor’s safety net, bonds still hold a very valuable place in a diversified portfolio, even at negative yields. And of course there are still plenty of bonds, bond funds and ETFs offering yields well above those being offered for cash in the bank.

Graham Bodel is the founder and director of a new fee-only financial planning and portfolio management firm based in Vancouver, BC., Chalten Fee-Only Advisors Ltd. This blog is republished with permission: the original can be found on Bodel’s blog here.

 

Wisdom Tree Canada’s first 6 ETFs; plus 6 ways to prolong nest eggs

wisdomtree-investments-squarelogo-1449147347386We mentioned this was coming in the FP early in June but it’s now official: the first batch of WisdomTree ETFs are now available in Canada.

While WisdomTree Canada opened its office earlier this year, the first six products started trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange Thursday (July 14).

The US parent company is best known for its dividend-weighted ETFs and currency-hedged equity strategies. The initial lineup is focused on the U.S., European and broad international equities. The Head of WisdomTree Canada is Raj Lala, pictured below.

Here’s what he said in a press release today:

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAA9AAAAJDEyOTQ5MmM5LWQ5MzQtNDA5OC05YWJiLTY2ZGFhMTQyYjMyMQ
Raj Lala

“By combining the best elements of active and passive investing, WisdomTree’s Smart Beta ETFs give Canadians the opportunity to participate in effective, risk-managed investments. We look forward to growing our business in Canada through a commitment to anticipating and addressing key investor needs.”

Here are the six ETFs and their TSX tickers: Continue Reading…

Two thirds of investors don’t know how much they pay in fees: survey

JustWealth Andrew Headshot
JustWealth’s Andrew Kirkland

A survey released today by Justwealth Financial Inc. finds a knowledge gap about how much Canadian investors are being charged on their investments: almost two thirds of those surveyed didn’t know exactly how much they paid in annual investment fees.

The survey of Canadians across Canada aged 25 or more was conducted via Google Consumer Surveys, and also uncovered a lack of awareness around upcoming regulatory changes to investment reporting requirements.

The changes surrounding the Client Relationship Model – Phase 2 or CRM2 — will take effect this Friday (July 15, 2016). They are the third annual list of amendments to promote increased disclosure regarding fees and investment performance. According to the Justwealth survey, 65.1 per cent are not aware of the upcoming changes. {See also Graham Bodel’s recent Hub blog on these changes: Big changes for mutual fund investors and Anthony Boright’s Hub blog entitled Get ready for POS3 and CRM2 deadlines.)

Conflicts keep investors in the dark

Continue Reading…