Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Are mutual fund DSCs holding you back?

robb-engen
Robb Engen, Boomer & Echo

By Robb Engen, Boomer & Echo

Special to the Financial Independence Hub
Many investors eventually come to the realization that the mutual funds sold by their bank or investment firm come with unjustifiably high fees. Making the switch to low cost index funds or ETFs sounds like the easiest, most logical choice; however, there is typically one final hurdle for investors to overcome.

Deferred sales charges – or DSCs – are a clever little trick designed by the mutual fund industry to compensate advisors and keep investors locked-in to their investments for a minimum length of time.

According to MoneySense’s Preet Banerjee, mutual funds originated in Canada in 1932 but didn’t take off until the invention of deferred sales charges in 1987:


A deferred sales charge schedule might look like this:

  • 1st year penalty – 5.5%
  • 2nd and 3rd year penalty – 5.0%
  • 4th and 5th year penalty – 4.0%
  • 6th year penalty – 3.0%
  • 7th year penalty – 2.0%
  • After 7 years – 0.0%

Let’s say an investor has $50,000 tied-up in high MER mutual funds at Investors Group. The average MER for her funds is 2.76% and she wants to switch to a portfolio of TD e-Series funds, which cost just 0.42%. But she’s only held her investments for four years and so she’d have to pay a $2,000 penalty (deferred sales charge) to sell the funds and make the move to TD.

Related: My two-fund solution

Now, most fund companies allow investors to redeem up to 10% of their units fee-free each year, meaning that this investor could withdraw $5,000 without penalty, reducing her total deferred sales charge to $1,800.

Some investors might feel compelled to stay put until the DSC schedule has lapsed or the fees have been reduced further, but at what point should the investor say, “screw it”, and just make the switch to the lower cost funds?

First, you’ll want to do some quick math to see the difference in dollar terms between the funds you’re leaving and the funds you’re moving to. In this case, the Investors Group funds cost the investor $1,380 annually, while the TD e-Series funds would cost just $210 per year – an annual savings of $1,180. It would take less than two years for the investor to come out ahead after making the switch, even though she ended up paying the $1,800 penalty.

Besides the mathematical solution, there are a number of behavioural reasons to make the switch sooner rather than later. I reached out to Canadian personal finance experts Rob Carrick, Preet Banerjee, and Dan Bortolotti to find out their thoughts on when (and why) it makes sense to pay the deferred sales charges on mutual funds.

Mr. Carrick, The Globe and Mail’s personal finance columnist, said he’d lean toward ripping the band-aid right off.

“A lot of this comes down to the total dollar cost of the deferred sales charges and what percentage of total assets they represent. The MER-related cost savings as shown (in the above example) are substantial and could probably offset the DSC in a few years at most.”

The decision also depends on what the investor is switching to. Moving from Investors Group to a do-it-yourself portfolio of stocks or ETFs can mean significant cost savings and a stronger argument for eating the DSCs right away.

“By contrast, if she’s moving to a fee-only advisor then the breakeven period is longer because the cost savings is lower,” said Canadian Couch Potato blogger Dan Bortolotti.

Banerjee says paying the fees and going forward for behavioural reasons makes a lot of sense because the investor can move ahead with one plan and start developing better habits right away. She’d also avoid second-guessing herself while she waits for the DSC fees to expire.

Related: How to transfer your RRSP from one bank to another

Gradually transitioning out of a DSC schedule sounds appealing, but Bortolotti says that some investors just won’t follow through, since it would require them to keep a close eye on things over a couple of years and send the instructions at the right time.

“I’ve seen investors fail to do this, in part because it’s just so discouraging to drag around those crappy funds for so long.”

Finally, Bortolotti suggests that investors evaluate just how bad their advisor relationship is. He says some DSC advisors are harmless, but others are aggressive in promoting loans and other destructive practices.

“If the client and advisor have a bad relationship I would be more inclined to just pay the fee and get out. If the advisor is willing to help you transition gradually, then that can make more sense.”

Readers: What is your experience with deferred sales charges? Did you make a clean break, transition out over time, or are they still holding you hostage?

In addition to running the Boomer & Echo website, Robb Engen is a fee-only financial planner. This article originally appeared on his site on April 9th and is republished on the Hub with his permission.

Foreign Withholding Taxes — the price of global diversification

Depositphotos_6444034_xsHere’s my latest MoneySense blog, which focuses on one of the ETF sessions I participated in last week’s ETF & Mutual Funds conference in Chicago, hosted by BMO Global Asset Management. You can find earlier Hub blogs from the conference through these three links:

Secular bull market still very much alive: BMO’s Brian Belski

A murder mystery: who will kill the global economy? 

Why are all these Canadian financial experts converging on Chicago?

For convenience, we’ve included the new blog below. Note too that you can find the original PWL white paper on Foreign Withholding Taxes here. We hope to run a slightly condensed version here at the Hub in the near future.  Continue Reading…

A murder mystery: who will kill the global economy?

busch
Andrew Busch (Twitter.com)

By Jonathan Chevreau

One of the more entertaining financial presentations at this week’s BMO investing conference in Chicago was a keynote talk by author and broadcaster Andrew Busch on who killed the global economy. (I qualify this with the phrase financial presentations because Rick Mercer’s talk was also highly entertaining but could hardly qualify as being financial).

By contrast, Busch had worked at BMO Capital Markets for 22 years earlier in his career and grew up in Chicago. His financial research is available free here.

Billing his talk as a “Murder Mystery,” he ran movie clips from various Film Noirs to illustrate his points.

Among his suspects; the ECB’s Mario Draghi, Japan prime minister Shinzo Abe, China president Xi Jinping and the Federal Reserve’s Janet Yellen. Busch played the role of “Private Economic Investigator.”

Resemblance to Greece?

yellen
Suspect 1

Starting with Yellen, he submitted clue number 1 as the unemployment rate. With 3 million Americans underemployed, this fact shows up in sluggish wage increases so “we’re not seeing an acceleration in wealth gains so are not seeing inflation.” What jumps out from the latest job numbers is where they are located; 14 million Americans are employed in local government, another 2.7 million in the federal government and 5 million more in the states. Continue Reading…

Secular bull market is very much alive: BMO’s Brian Belski

belski
Brian Belski

By Jonathan Chevreau

“The largest stealth bull market of our careers” is still very much alive, says BMO Capital Markets chief investment strategist Brian Belski.

In the keynote address  Wednesday for BMO Global Asset Management’s Global Vision, Global Perspectives conference in Chicago, the American-born investment veteran said U.S. stocks are now six years into a 20-year secular bull market.

“Bull markets rarely end when everyone is looking for an end to them,” he said, “The media is consumed with negativity.”

Canada “bottoming”

While Belski believes America is setting the pace for global markets, Canada “is in the process of bottoming,” he said. Most of the investment professionals at the three-day conference on mutual funds and ETFs are Canadian. It might not yet be quite time to buy Canada, he added, since the first quarter has been one of “shock and awe” caused by the worldwide plunge in energy prices. Looking further out, though, he said “Canada is the place to be.”

One reason the Canadian market has languished is a call by a large Wall Street firm to “sell Canada.”   Continue Reading…

Settling on the elusive definition of Financial Independence

Money flying out of cage birds , Financial independence , eps10Here’s my latest MoneySense column, which tries to nail down a definitive definition of Financial Independence. As I note in the above headline, this exercise is a bit more elusive than you might think, and the waters continue to be muddied by the mainstream term, Retirement, which I do NOT regard as synonymous.

As also noted in the Hub’s version below, I’m inviting reader feedback: Has Wikipedia’s definition nailed it, or can the term be improved?

Maybe I should grab the bull by the horns and create my own formal definition of Findependence, even though I view that term simply as a contraction of Financial Independence.

Reader input welcome! Continue Reading…