General

Happy Income as the Alternative to Findependence?

jenyaBelow is an essay by long-time investment adviser and tax preparer Jenya Rose (@jenyarose on Twitter). Here’s what she tweeted shortly after last Friday’s launch of The Hub.

My reaction to the #findependence movement. Love ya @JonChevreau but I had to add a less traveled path to the convo. http://tinyurl.com/nngyrze

Jenya’s essay appeared on November 11th on her Rose Tax and Financial blog/newsletter. It’s entitled The Financial Independence Alternative: Happy Income.

By all means click on the link in red and read. With her permission, I’ve reproduced her essay below, untouched. For now, I’ll say what I tweeted back today: I don’t think Findependence and Happy Income are at all odds. I’ll provide my full response on this site tomorrow and give Jenya permission to run it on her blog as well. For now, we’ll let Jenya speak for herself:

The Financial Independence Alternative: Happy Income

By Jenya Rose

Don’t get me wrong; I love Jonathan Chevreau’s information. I greatly respect the path he is sharing with us to become “findependent” long before retirement. As an investment advisor at the beginning of my career, I’ve been surrounded by charts and graphs showing how starting investing in your 20’s is the best way to use compounding interest to create a massive nest egg. And how every year that you wait your chances of amassing anything decent wane.

This fills me with dread and regret. Dread and regret! Looking at these charts does more harm than good to me. And I know I’m not alone. We are a very self-involved culture; and when we learn new information we immediately relate it to our own life. How do these graphs relate to me? They tell me, “You screwed up bigtime.”

Bubble picI’m forty-something and had a very privileged
childhood.
From private school to boarding school to college I never thought about money or what anything cost. I spent my summers traveling, never had a summer job, and by 21 I had been to every continent except Antarctica and Australia. I felt jaded. All I did was shop and party. I remember saying, “I’ve done it all.” I feared that the rest of my life held nothing but a monotonous rich girl’s Groundhog Day. That was far from the truth.

An inheritance carried me through the rest of my 20’s while I flipped houses and worked on a few half masters degrees. I met my fabulous husband, who was in the same boat mentally at the time. We floated along adding more degrees and certifications to our higher learning (nothing particularly business or money-driven; we studied acupuncture, meditation, yoga, archetypal psychotherapy, art).

We flipped a house in Austin and moved to California and this time we did things differently: we didn’t by another house. Instead we decided to put the money into a business – a yoga studio – how could we go wrong? Famous last words. Knowing nothing about business, taxes, accounting, marketing – we have been under a mountain of debt for a decade now and have learned more lessons the hard way than we ever thought possible.

After that sustained level of suffering I decided to take a tax course to see what all the hoopla was about. Fascinating stuff! I’ve been a tax preparer ever since. I started my own tax business 2 years ago, am still hanging by a thread financially, still with a mountain of debt, but I’m thrilled to go to work in the morning! Retire? I think not. I’ve just now figured it out. The thought that I would only do this for the next 25 years and retire at 65 is a nightmare. I want to be chatting with clients and enjoying the puzzle of tax returns until I can’t lift my body out of bed in the morning.

So I got a late start. And I think a lot of other people are in the same boat. I’m not convinced that it is a generation X experience. I believe there are many people that are “middle-aged” (if we’re still calling it that) who are just getting a late start to living a passionate work life. Maybe they had a job in their past life and they quit that job to follow a dream (with or without adequate savings). And now they are bombarded with age-based charts of how much money they need for this old-timey “retirement” thing and they are filled with dread. Wake up people! You are in a different class, you are the happy income people!

Cab456ac24084abI call it happy income. Income derived from something you are passionate about and that you can see yourself doing until you can’t do anything anymore. Most people have unhappy income. They hate their job, the people they work with; or they’re just bored to tears. You can tell who the unhappy income people are: they are the ones with #TGIF all over their social media, and an “I hate Mondays” sign in their office with the image of Garfield or another cat looking disgruntled. This is not us!

We are the happy income people. We may not have much of a financial portfolio, but we have a “life portfolio” that we are currently enjoying the crap out of. 70 is the new 30 – just ask my mom. She is 78 and spends her days running around like a chicken with her head cut off looking for things to do. She started a career in acting at 55 and, if you know any actors, they have a lot of free time in between auditions. The “retirement” concept of yesteryear is outdated and needs to be put to sleep.

If you are long in the tooth and feel like you’re just starting out financially don’t stress. When you read articles on millennials who are already financially independent, just know that you are in a class of people that has taken a different path. Yes, debt sucks. Yes, watching the bull market and knowing you could have made a bunch of money sucks. Yes, looking at your classmates/former colleagues facebook pics of extravagant vacations and new summer homes sucks. But if you could take a pic of your “sustainable happy income situation” I believe they would look at that pic longingly (in secret of course).

If you’re keeping your head above water and building something that you care about you are in an enviable position. Because happy income is forever.

* This was my first post, but there is more to come re: the less traveled path of happy income. Hopefully each of our unique journeys can help us to tread uncommon financial paths with less worry that we’ve fallen behind. :)

 

 

 

The one-page guide to Findependence

grs_titleConsidering that I once put an entire financial plan into a single tweet, it shouldn’t be too surprising that there exists a one-page guide to Financial Independence.

This one-page guide to Financial Independence is from J.D. Roth’s Get Rich Slowly site. (naturally, I would call it the one-page guide to Findependence!) Naturally, the strategy revolves around that most basic premise of personal finance: live below your means and spend less than you earn: much much less. So that you can save much much more. Not just the modest 10 to 20% that most people shoot for in their IRAs or RRSPs: Roth suggests saving at least 50% of your income, and preferably up to 70%.

Extreme? Indeed, Roth calls it Extreme Saving but that’s also the kind of savings levels that     Extreme Early Retirement gurus like Mr. Money Moustache and Jacob Lund Fisker advocate. The latter’s book can be found here.

As per the philosophy of this site, I would call this Extreme Early Findependence, not Extreme Early Retirement, which is why we call one of our soon-to-launch discussion forums Extreme Early Findependence.

Affluent may qualify for GIS: key is large TFSAs

Good piece in Wednesday’s Financial Post by Morneau Shepell’s Fred Vettese about how even higher-income Canadians may be able to qualify for the Guaranteed Income Supplement to Old Age Security. Normally, those with big RRSPs fret about having OAS benefits clawed back and they don’t even think about the GIS.

But, as writers have been pointing out ever since the Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA, the Canadian equivalent of the U.S. Roth plans) started up in January 2009, a big benefit of the TFSA is that when you pull money out it’ s not only tax-free but also doesn’t result in clawbacks of either OAS or the GIS. Today, it’s common to see TFSAs with balances of $40,000 and in some cases much more. (See the annual MoneySense Great TFSA contest, where some of the “winners” have hundreds of thousands in them. Similar tales have been told in recent issues of the Financial Post.)

Consider that a dual-income couple could by now easily have between $80,000 and $100,000 in a TFSA, even if conservatively invested. Add another $11,000 between them in January 2015 and we’re talking real money.

Vettese’s article is the best I’ve seen even pointing this out. Put this into your “Decumulation” file!

Do investors need to start worrying about Russia?

Good piece by Bloomberg today on the emerging troubles for Russia. Here is the Financial Post’s play of the story.

Like troubled Brazil, Russia is another trouble spot among the four BRIC nations. (Brazil, Russia, India, China). While most investors probably have minimal exposure to BRIC economies (either through BRIC ETFs or mutual funds, or in more diluted fashion, Emerging Markets funds), this is an example of a geo-political emerging event that bears carefully watching.

Sometimes these seemingly limited local eruptions have a way of spreading globally and ultimately impacting markets far beyond. For an example, check out this Wikipedia entry on the 1997 Asian crisis, which began in Thailand. I dare say when investors first heard about trouble with the collapsing Thai baht, they had no idea the trouble would soon spread to the rest of Asia, with possible global repercussions. To contain it, the IMF had to step in with US$40 billion.

So investors should monitor the events in Russia closely. This is a good example of why we need to pay attention to geopolitics and macroeconomics. Right now, ISIS, oil, Turkey and the Middle East is at centre stage of investor concerns but the events in Russia, including the Ukraine, call for scrutiny and caution. Here’s Business Insider’s take on Russsia’s encroachments on the Ukraine.

Songs of Innocence: I still like U2’s iTunes gambit

U2iPhoneInteresting followup in the New York Times on the weekend to the September 9th release of U2’s album, Songs of innocence and its controversial decision to download it unasked-for on to the playlists of half a billion iTunes users. Despite the blowback, the paper reports that 100 million people have listened to at least a song or two and 30 million people had listened to the whole album.

Including me. In this blog at our sister site a few weeks ago, I argued that U2 is going to be repaid for its experiment with many more paid downloads of its back catalogue. That’s how I justified the Financial Independence angle in the blog: it was more about U2’s ultimate findependence than that of its listeners. Still, I feel richer for the listening exprience.

In fact, after I wrote the first blog on the old site, I confessed I had bought two more U2 albums each for $5.99. Since I posted that, and as I predicted of myself, I’ve purchased most of the other albums I missed. My 23-year old daughter is already berating me for playing nothing but U2: as I said earlier, when it comes to music, I’m a serial monogamist.

Right now, I like No Line on the Horizon the best of all U2’s albums. I had totally missed it when it came out in 2009, its 12th album. Remember, and as the Times points out, it was almost exactly a decade ago that Steve Jobs and U2 appeared on stage together to introduce “an odd-sounding device called the iPod and a marketplace for music called iTunes.”