Hub Blogs

Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.

Happy Money vs. Findependence

text happy moneyWhile more and more financial pundits seem more inclined to retire the term Retirement, it’s by no means clear what the preferred term should be. Obviously I’m biased since I’ve invested six years in the term “Findependence,” culminating in this web site, the Financial Independence Hub. Over the weekend, we linked to Roger Wohlner’s site and his reposting of a one-year-old posting by me arguing the case for Financial Independence over Retirement. And last week, we posted financial planner Jenya Rose’s piece making the case for Happy Money over Findependence.
I then responded to that piece here at the Hub and now Jenya has reposted that piece over at her own site. She announced this on Twitter on Monday, with this gracious tweet:
responds nimbly to my post that argued is moot if you have Happy Income Touché! :)
Love that use of the hashtag in front of #Findependence!

Guerrilla Frugality & Froogers

LunchEarlier this fall, I gave a short interview to robo-adviser/light advice firm NestWealth.com about financial independence, ETFs and the term I often use in Findependence Day: guerrilla frugality. You can find it here.

I first used the term “guerrilla frugality” in a personal finance column in the Financial Post. The idea was that early retirement (or findependence) requires a sort of super-frugality.

Guerrilla warfare and guerrilla marketing are both phrases already in the public lexicon. I reasoned that as consumers, we’re constantly besieged by the “guerrilla marketing” efforts of well-heeled advertisers and stealth marketers. So in order to spend less than you earn consistently, in order to save and invest the difference, you need to become super-frugal and practice “guerrilla frugality.”  (Note, it’s not “gorilla,” which some readers have mistakenly used in their correspondence with me. Gorilla is the ape!)

In the book, we talk (in war terms) of donning the battle fatigues of the “Frugality Guerrilla,” which we shortened to “Frooger.”

I’ve used the photo of a brown-bag lunch to illustrate this blog, since the character in the novel starts to brown bag it once he decides he wants to be “findependent” by age 50. In his guest post here at the Hub last week, millennial Sean Cooper also describes how he “brown bagged” it (among many other frugal endeavours) to accelerate his mortgage pay down campaign.

Formal definitions in the Glossary of the new ebooks

In the glossary to two new e-books published earlier this month, we offer these two definitions:

Guerrilla Frugality: A term invented by the author to describe the “warlike” mentality of being super-frugal in order to resist the strong consumption messages of America’s markets and advertisers.

Frooger (Frugality Guerrilla): An invented term in this book describing anyone highly committed to being frugal and saving money.

US fee-only financial planner Sheryl Garrett used the term “frooger” in both her foreword to the US edition of Findependence Day, published in 2013, as well as the new US ebook. Because it appears near the front, you can read Sheryl’s foreword free by clicking on the “Look Inside” feature on either the full book or the abbreviated e-book edition.

Financial Independence or Retirement … Which is the Better Goal?

wohlner
Roger Wohlner, TheChicagoFinancialPlanner.com

The Chicago Financial Planner — aka Roger Wohlner — ran a guest editorial written by me on his blog this weekend. If it looks familiar, it’s because the Hub ran it earlier in the weekend under a slightly different headline. Why Financial Independence is a Better Goal than Retirement. That blog was picked up a year ago by the Retirement and Good Living Blog.

I had also run a guest post on Roger’s blog a year ago after the U.S. edition of Findependence Day was published in 2013. After all, both the U.S. and Canadian editions of the book are set in part in Chicago!

After an exchange this weekend on Twitter about the above post, Roger offered to run the blog as a followup to the first one but indicated he preferred to run his own headline. He chose the one used in this post, which is a bit more neutral. So if you missed the earlier one,  please do check out Roger’s version. Apart from the headline, it’s also different because of an extensive preamble Roger wrote to introduce it, with comments about the “Findependence” movement to which this site, The Financial Independence Hub,  is dedicated.

Posting on Twitter as @rwohlner Roger is one of the most followed Certified Financial Planners (CFPs) in the United States. You can also find him listed under our “Getting Help” tab.

What do you think? 

As I posted this Monday morning, there were three comments about the article on Roger’s site. After you read them, it would be great to get some reader feedback about these two terms (Retirement vs. Findependence) here at the Hub. Also note another post from this morning: 5 fears you shouldn’t have about retirement. Read them over and ask yourself how many of those fears would still apply if you substituted the phrase “financial independence” for retirement.

While we’re still tweaking our discussion forums, registered users should be able to use the Comment feature below. If anyone attempts to do so and is having difficulty posting a comment, please email me at jonathan@findependenceday.com.

Why Financial Independence is a better goal than retirement

Here’s a piece I wrote a year ago that got picked up by another blog. It pretty well sums up the point of the Financial Independence Hub. You can go to the posting in the Retirement and Good Living blog but since I wrote it (the author credit they provide is J. Chevreau), I’m republishing it here below. Go to the link and you’ll see four comments below, including one reader who says they “love the contraction of financial and independence to give you findependence! Good stuff.”

By Jonathan Chevreau

One of the problems with selling the concept of Retirement to young people is that old age just seems so impossibly far away in the distant future. The financial services industry and the mass media love to talk about retirement but let’s face it, if you’re a recent college graduate just entering the workforce, retirement is perceived as something far far in the future, just one step before the equally remote prospect of death.

Findependence far more accessible for young than Retirement

The pity is there’s a much better term that could be substituted for Retirement. It’s called Financial Independence or what I’ve dubbed “Findependence.” (simply a contraction of the two words.)

Financial independence is a goal that can be achieved not 30 or 40 years from now but in 10 or 15 years. It’s not unreasonable for a 25 year old just taking their first step on the career ladder and embarking on marriage, family formation and home ownership to set a goal of financial independence (or “Findependence”) by the time they’re age 40.

Findependence is not synonymous with Retirement

Relaxed businesswoman talking on mobile phone at home officeDoes that mean “early retirement” at such a tender age? No, because Findependence is not synonymous with Retirement. Most of us know what Retirement is but for a refresher course on Financial Independence, go to Wikipedia and search the term Financial Independence. You’ll find an entry which is simple enough to grasp: financial independence is the state of being able to have enough financial wealth to live “without having to work actively for basic necessities.”

If you’re findependent, your assets generate income greater than your expenses. Note that Findependence is not correlated with age. If you have modest means and have been frugal enough to build up a nest egg in 10 or 15 years, you may well be “findependent” by age 40 or so. Conversely, if you’re a high-earning high-spending professional who requires hundreds of thousands of dollars of income a year, findependence may not be in your grasp even by the traditional age of retirement.

You can see why people often confuse the terms since two ways of generating passive income is often employer pensions and Social Security or other pensions paid by governments. These particular income sources do not begin until one’s late 50s or 60s. But again, if your needs are modest, you might well be able to establish early findependence solely with a portfolio of dividend-paying stocks, perhaps supplemented by part-time jobs or freelance work.

Boomertirement

For baby boomers, the so-called “New Retirement” will often prove to be a variant of Findependence and traditional Retirement. Very few boomers, even if they have the financial means, will embrace the traditional “full-stop” retirement of their parents who enjoyed Defined Benefit pension plans. The older generation may have experienced the gold watch and a quarter century of golf, bridge, reading but boomers are much more likely to embrace a semi-retirement that consists partly of employer pensions, supplemented by government pensions, taxable investment income and part-time employment income, and perhaps the fruits of certain creative endeavors: royalties from literary or musical creations, licensing fees from various entrepreneurial ventures, fees from serving as corporate directors and other sources of income.

 

Core & Explore Redux

MotleyFoolMotley Fool Canada just posted my latest blog for them, which addresses the question of whether it’s possible to combine indexing (“Core”) and high-conviction stock-picking or the judicious choice of certain sector ETFs. (“Explore.”)

As I note in the piece, this is a followup to Preet Banerjee’s feature story on this topic last year in MoneySense. It also features a nod to MoneySense stock-picking guru Norm Rothery, who also writes for the Globe and Mail, and publishes his own Stingy Investor newsletter.

Strange Bedfellows

I’ve commented before in the editor’s note at MoneySense that Norm is a strange bedfellow to indexing guru Dan Bortolotti, who runs the Canadian Couch Potato blog. It was Dan along with his colleague Justin Bender at PWL Capital who I was thinking of when in the Motley Fool post I referred to “indexing purists” who generally scoff at the notion of poisoning the purity of indexing with such an unsavoury activity as picking stocks. Another indexing purist I had in mind was Mike Bayer at Burgeonvest Bick. You can can find Dan, Justin and Mike all listed at the “Getting Help” section here at the Hub.

And yet when at MoneySense we got reader feedback to Preet’s story, it seemed that more often than not in the real world of actual investing behaviour, fairly sophisticated do-it-yourself investors often engaged in a blend of stock- or sector-ETF picking and traditional “Core” use of low-cost broadly diversified ETFs. (What Vanguard founder John Bogle recommends and no doubt the Bogleheads discussion forums.)

Foolish or foolish?

As I asked at the end of the piece for the Fool, do you think Core & Explore is a foolish practice (that’s with a lower-case f, so a bad thing) or a Foolish thing (that’s with an upper case F in FoolLand and therefore a good thing)?

Please email me at jonathan@findependenceday.com and we’ll do a followup piece on this, either here or for another media outlet, or probably both.