Hub Blogs

Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.

Expanded CPP may not increase retirement income: Fraser Institute

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 21, 2015

As the Globe & Mail and Financial Post both reported Tuesday, a new study by the Fraser Institute finds that an expansion of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) may not raise incomes of retirees because people will save less on their own.

The report, which is to be released today, found that private savings fell as CPP contribution levels rose between 1986 and 2008. CPP contribution rates were 3.6% of earnings in 1986 (half from employers, half from employees) and rose to the current combined level of 9.9% by 2003.

Impact varies with income and age

The study found the impact of higher CPP contribution rates varies with income and age. So for households with annual income under $34,140, a one percentage-point increase in contribution rate resulted in a 1.56-percentage-point fall in private savings. But middle-income households earning up to $59,920 cut their savings by 0.72 percentage points: less than the full amount of the CPP increase. And high-income earners making over $59,920 were found to have almost no change in their saving rates as CPP rates rose.

The report’s co-author, Charles Lamman told the Globe that relatively few Canadians are under saving for retirement: mostly the elderly, widows and singles, and those without a work history that makes them eligible fort the CPP. So for those people, a CPP expansion would not be helpful.

The Financial Post version of the story can be found here. The Post also ran a piece by the report’s authors on its FP Comment page: Shifting Retirement Savings. You can also view a video commentary on the report on the Fraser Institute’s website, here.

Vinnie the Loan Shark: Citizen of the Year

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | July 20, 2015

Depositphotos_3775528_s-2015 — Vinnie the Loan Shark (DepositPhotos).

By Horst Siegler

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The most important definitions are not found in the dictionary; they are the ones you make for yourself to serve your purposes.

You first encountered this idea when your mother told you to clean your room. When you thought you were done she made you clean it some more. The problem was not with the room; the problem was she had a different idea of what a clean room meant (it didn’t mean shove everything under the bed or into the closet and close the door). Besides, you wanted to get outside to play and she wanted the room tidy.

In a posting titled How Findependence differs from Retirement, Jonathan Chevreau makes a case for how he believes the two words are different and why. He argues that you might be financially independent before you retire because you no longer work for a salary. Some who retire need to continue to work because their income doesn’t meet their needs. His definitions for the words are his own.

Credit cards as “survival tools”

Weekly Wrap: Horrendous market timers, Big Mac Index, NHLers defrauded by advisers

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 18, 2015

A piece on market timing is a “must read” for anyone who takes market-timing gurus and newsletters overly seriously. Read A Visual History of Market Crash Predictions. (Note the reference embedded in the URL to “the clowns of Wall Street.”)

Yes, all the big fear-monger names are there, including Harry Dent Jr., Robert Prechter, Marc Faber and even a few Marketwatch columnists and the generally respected Mark Hulbert.

As the piece says, you need to remember that almost everyone has something to sell, and the pundits mentioned generally are in the business of selling newsletters, books, market-timing services or related items. And since Fear is a more visceral emotion than Greed, the scarier the headlines these prognostications generate, the more publicity the market prognosticators are likely to reap, and with that more sales of their products or services. As they say in the newspaper business, “If it bleeds, it leads.”

And admit it, would YOU buy a book bearing the calm and sensible title “Markets will fluctuate, stay diversified for the long run and have a sensible asset allocation?” A better title might be “Ignore these idiots.”

Reader reaction to Eternal Truths series

The life and death vow of joint credit

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | July 17, 2015

Richard Moxley

By Richard Moxley

Your palms are sweaty, your mind is racing! Are you ready for such a commitment? It is the next step in your relationship, isn’t it? Even if the odds are against you, but your love is different … stronger!

Right? If you have been in a serious relationship or are planning to, you will relate to the thoughts and concerns mentioned above. However, I am not talking about marriage; I am referring to joint credit.

How it can hurt

Having joint credit won’t automatically lower your score; however, it does increase your risk. As soon as you put your name on and sign an application, you are fully responsible for the complete balance and paying the minimum payment. The banks and lenders don’t care who spent the money, what it was spent on, who has it now, or what it is now worth. If they don’t get their money back as outlined in the contract you are both on the hook for everything. Even if everything on your credit is great, one collection or one bad account will cost you thousands in high interest and fees. You may even be declined.

The odds are not in your favour!

What are the chances of your relationship ending? I’m not generally a big fan of “what if?” questions but it’s important to weigh risk when it comes to personal finance. It doesn’t matter whether your relationship status is boyfriend, girlfriend, common law, partners, or even married. What are the chances of your relationship ending? Most stats give you around a 50/50 chance. If you are a hopeless romantic or really in love then I’m sure you will give yourself a higher chance of success.

Here is the hard cold truth. There is a 100% chance of your relationship changing. When I talk about joint credit most people assume I am talking just about separation or divorce but there is another “D” word that most people don’t want to think about.

The other “D” word

It doesn’t matter if you are in a relationship with your soul mate — death is still guaranteed. You cannot have a joint account with someone who has passed on. As soon as the bank finds out that one of the applicants is deceased you now have to close that account and apply for a new credit card, line of credit, or loan. If all your established credit is held jointly, you will have to start rebuilding your credit all over again if your spouse passes away.

Joint credit alone doesn’t hurt your credit but you need to know how the scoring system works so you don’t end up in trouble. My advice is to make sure you have built individual accounts if possible to limit your risk and protect yourself from having to start rebuilding your credit later on in life. For more free tips on credit you can visit my blog, www.eCreditFix.ca. If you would like to attend a free event to learn more about the other rules of credit visit our events page.

Richard Moxley is the Author of the book, The Nine Rules of Credit – How to Start, Rebuild, and Always Maintain Great Credit. He is also the founder of eCreditFix.ca. Richard has shared his credit expertise with financial professionals and the Average Joes across Canada and the U.S. His vision is too teach all Canadians the rules of the “Credit Game” so they can play the game to win!

The case for dividend ETFs

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | July 15, 2015

Here is my monthly ETF column for the Financial Post, titled Jonathan Chevreau: Why Dividend Funds are a smart financial move.

The piece mentions several dividend ETFs from manufacturers like BMO, Vanguard and iShares but also presents the views of a few ETF specialists who are not as enthusiastic about these products.

Well suited to TFSAs

Personally, I think Canadian dividend funds are particularly well suited to Tax-Free Savings Accounts: they’re diversified, provide dividend income, have reasonable fees and don’t result in any withholding of tax that may occur with foreign dividend ETFs. The latter are better held in RRSPs, in my view.

Of course, those who are cautious about the stock market will prefer to stuff registered plans with fixed-income vehicles like GICs and put their dividend ETFs into non-registered (taxable) accounts that let Canadians benefit from the dividend tax credit.

The case for being “an owner, not a loaner” was made by me in the fifth “Eternal Truth” of Personal Finance in the recent series that ran in the Post, both online and in the paper. You can find that piece as well as a short (1-minute) video under the headline Embrace Risk, Pay Less Tax. You can find the whole series here. Continue Reading…

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Sign up for our Daily Digest E-Mail!