Hub Blogs

Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.

How Far is the Stock Market Likely to Fall?

bobcable
Robert S. Cable

By Robert S. Cable, The Cable Group

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

For the vast majority of people, investing will, at times, become emotional. We may hope for the market to pull back into what is referred to as a “healthy correction” but when this ultimately happens it never feels healthy.

When we see our portfolios drop in value and the press trot out stories comparing today to the market tops of 2000 or 2007 or even the 1987 crash, we begin to think in terms of worst-case scenarios or even worse than worst case.

We’re conditioned to think in terms of extremes. We’re either at a market top and about to crash or less often, because fear is a stronger emotion than greed, near a market bottom and the market is about to soar. These extremes do occur and they’re always possible but the reality is that it’s unlikely we’re at one today because these extremes are indeed rare. There’s simply a lot more back-and-forth movement to the markets than the average investor recognizes.

It’s inevitable that we’re going to see the market fall 10% in the not too distant future. This happens more often than you likely think it does. Does this mean it’s the start of another 50% market crash? Maybe, but not likely.

Let history be our guide

Continue Reading…

Retire Retirement?

41a03oj1QIL._SX325_BO1,204,203,200_The notion of “retiring retirement” or at least the term Retirement is coming more into vogue these days as more baby boomers reach the traditional ages of the old-fashioned “full-stop” retirement.

The current edition of Bloomberg Businessweek magazine has a piece titled “Watch out, Boomers, Here Comes 70,” noting that millions of baby boomers around the world are turning 70 this year.

In the U.S. that means they will come up against the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules on IRAs and 401(k)s, with many forced to pay taxes on those forced withdrawals. Canadian retirees with Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs) are in a similar boat by the end of the year they turn 71. (By the way, I’m preparing a Special Report on RRIFs later this month, and welcome input from professionals with expertise here.)

Of course, the Boomers don’t appear set to leave the workforce quietly. In researching my portion of my own upcoming book (Victory Lap Retirement), I came across a 2008 book by Tamara Erickson titled Retire Retirement, subtitled Career Strategies for the Boomer Generation.

Demography favors Boomers’ third phase of work life

Continue Reading…

Panama Papers: Latest Hole in the Offshore Secrecy Dike

David Rotfleisch-03-500W
David Rotfleisch

By David J. Rotfleisch

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The headlines are talking about an unprecedented leak of secret papers and data involving murky and even illegal offshore financial transactions of prominent politicians and celebrities all over the world. Some 11.5 million documents, 2.6 terabytes of data, detailing than 210,000 companies, foundations and trusts are contained in the information released from Mossack Fonseca, a law firm based in Panama.

Wondering why your next door neighbor takes a lot of long weekends to Belize, the Canary Islands, or Panama?

Includes 350 Canadians with offshore accounts

Included in the leak are the passport details of 350 Canadians who have offshore accounts and may, or may not, have been avoiding paying taxes on the offshore income. Canada Revenue Agency will go after any and all Canadians who have not paid the tax on those accounts. That’s the law and their job.

Continue Reading…

How to avoid cognitive biases

AmanRaina
Aman Raina

By Aman Raina, Sage Investors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In my last series of articles, I’ve reviewed some core cognitive biases that are constantly messing with our brains and can impair our ability to make better investment decisions. These biases are:

Groupthink/Herd Behaviour

Optimism Bias

Expert Bias

Confirmation Bias

Recency Bias

Geographical Bias

We’ve seen how all of these forces and tensions, poke and prod our emotions and decision making. The big questions is, can we eliminate these behaviours or are we stuck with them?

The simple answer is No. We’re human and as such we are ALL predisposed to these behaviours and always will be. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Sage Investor, Warren Buffett or David Tepper. At some point one or likely all of these biases will come into play.

We cannot eliminate cognitive behaviours but we can manage or control them by instilling some emotional discipline.

How to Manage Our Brain

The reality and some may say the sad, bizarre reality is we need to start thinking more like this guy.

 

We need to think more like George Costanza and try to take the other side of the trade. If you remember the episode, George made a life changing mood by deciding to do the opposite of what his instincts normally tell him. The result is George gets the job and the girl.

It sounds really really stupid and without any logic; however in investing, it appears that taking a contrarian approach and challenging conventional wisdom can go a long way to making better investment decisions. I wouldn’t go out and do what George was doing, however. Certain flashpoints in the psychology of how investors behave can provide good starting points for doing some due diligence that can uncover tomorrows great investment opportunities. Below are some easy methods for managing the various biases that throw us for a loop.

Groupthink/Herding Bias: We need to avoid what the consensus or conventional thinking is on a particular stock or business event.  At the very least, we should be challenging what the consensus is saying and also we need to listen closely to what the consensus does not like as they are likely to be tomorrow’s winners. We need to avoid chasing hot trends or the “It” stock or the investment strategy flavour of the month and stick to long term first principles of investing (i.e. invest in companies and ideas that create consistent tangible wealth from the scarce capital they have been entrusted with by shareholders and are trading at a discount to their value).

We need to looking out for companies and ideas that are not in vogue because chances are the market has punished them so much that the stock has become a decent entry point. I’m always looking out for companies that can demonstrate that they can be profitable when business conditions are tough, because when the pendulum turns, a great opportunity will exist to generate some meaningful returns. Dull, unsexy, and boring companies are truly gold.

Optimism Bias: We need to avoid getting immersed in just the positive of an investment opportunity. We need to seek out alternative views and perspectives. If I am researching a stock, I’m obviously interested in looking the positives in the business. (Is it profitable? Do they sell a product that people will buy again and again? Are they financially strong? Etc). I also need to be just as interested in alternative perspectives that are just as important in framing the investment decision. What are the risks the company faces in their industry? What is their competition? Is there any competition?

Expert Bias: Experts aren’t going away. We shouldn’t ignore them and we should always listen as they provide a perspective. We need to focus less on their forecasts and predictions as the research has shown they are no better than any of us in predicting the future. We should however pay close to their commentary that is critical or negative to a business concept as often those provide opportunities to uncover the diamond in the rough opportunities and a starting point for some due diligence.

The best example I can think of is Apple when the stock started tanking. It felt like every analyst was pounding the table saying the company had lost its way and lost its ability to create innovative products. This after creating some of the most innovative products in history (iPhone, iPad, iPod) that were still selling millions and millions of units. It wasn’t enough for the analysts and pundits (most of whom have never run a business of their own by the way).  What happened? They came up with a watch. They upgraded their phones with new features and they still sold tons of them and at one point became the largest company in the world by market cap. If you were able to put aside the noise by the experts and focussed on the fact the company was selling 45 million phones a quarter and literally printing money, you could have bought the stock at a 30-40 per cent discount.

Confirmation Bias: We need to consume and process information from sources who may not share the same value systems, beliefs and ideologies as we do. They provide perspective, context and a lot of times, a reality check. If I believe in value investing, I shouldn’t ignore insights from people who study market psychology or technical market indicators. They have nuggets of wisdom from which we can profit. Start following on Twitter or Facebook people who adopt investment strategies that are different from yours.

Recency Bias: When we invest, we are trying to make rationale, intelligent guesses about the future. As a result we need to reduce our dependence on using information of the moment as the foundation of the investment decision. If anything, we need to recognize the stories and snapshots of the moment so that we can begin looking at the alternatives. It is from there that we will find the winners of tomorrow that we seek. So if I’m seeing magazine and newspaper covers trumpeting that the stock market closed at a record high, it should act as a flag to me that the easy money has been made and that things may get a bit choppy going forward. Conversely, I watch the news and see a news reports about investors being nervous about putting money into the stock market, I’ll perk up because we could be nearing a moment where an optimal time may be at hand to slowly start building positions.

Geographical Bias: We love our homecooking. The reality is keeping a large amount of your investments domestically is not going give your portfolio the juice it needs to generate long term meaningful returns. We need to get outside our postal code and embrace the fact that business is a global organism and some of the greatest ideas do not necessarily reside in North America. Open the doors.

Easier Said Than Done

Indeed, taking all of these actions in a consistent manner is not easy and it is something that you cannot just flip a switch to change your behaviours. It takes a long time and likely will come with some scrapes and bruises. It is a process. At the same time it is possible, especially if you have a network around you of resources and people that can keep you on the straight and narrow. I believe more than ever that managing these behaviors and biases is the secret sauce that can elevate our financial literacy and the level of success we need to meet our long term financial and life goals.

Aman Raina, MBA is an Investment Coach and founder of Sage Investors, an independent practice specializing in investment coaching and portfolio analysis services. This blog was originally published on his web site and is reproduced  here with permission. 

Continue Reading…

FWB TV: Your Biases — YOU present the greatest risk to your portfolio

Screen Shot 2016-03-31 at 9.53.34 AM
Tim Richards, Psy-Fi Blog

The latest Evidence-based Investor Video  is now available at FWB TV: Your Biases: YOU present the greatest risk to your portfolio.

Markets may be efficient; In 2013, Eugene Fama received a Nobel prize in economics for proving this theory. Yet investors continue to fear the markets when in fact the greatest danger to their portfolio is themselves.

In this four-minute video Tim Richards of the Psy-Fi Blog (pictured) says most investors behave irrationally and that if they insist on trying to buy and sell stocks on their own, they will predictably lose money because of ill-timed decisions. He estimates that such investors can lose between 3% to 4% per year because of poor buy and sell decisions.

Blind spot bias

Many investors suffer from the so-called “blind spot” bias, meaning that while they may be aware of biases (like confirmation bias) exhibited by OTHER people, they’re unaware of the biases they themselves may suffer from when investing.

Richards says the best defence to loss-generating biases is passive investing: using broadly diversified index mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and holding on for the long run.  Only a small minority of investors who are able to disregard their emotions should attempt active trading of securities, and even then Richards is skeptical that such an approach will consistently beat passive investing strategies.

While even passive investors are not immune from irrational behaviour like selling everything during a downturn, their odds are improved by being aware of their biases and better yet by using a financial advisor who is acquainted with the topic of behavioural finance.

After watching the video if you want to learn more, download the free guide, 12 Essential Ideas For Building Wealth.