All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Happy Income as the Alternative to Findependence?

jenyaBelow is an essay by long-time investment adviser and tax preparer Jenya Rose (@jenyarose on Twitter). Here’s what she tweeted shortly after last Friday’s launch of The Hub.

My reaction to the #findependence movement. Love ya @JonChevreau but I had to add a less traveled path to the convo. http://tinyurl.com/nngyrze

Jenya’s essay appeared on November 11th on her Rose Tax and Financial blog/newsletter. It’s entitled The Financial Independence Alternative: Happy Income.

By all means click on the link in red and read. With her permission, I’ve reproduced her essay below, untouched. For now, I’ll say what I tweeted back today: I don’t think Findependence and Happy Income are at all odds. I’ll provide my full response on this site tomorrow and give Jenya permission to run it on her blog as well. For now, we’ll let Jenya speak for herself:

The Financial Independence Alternative: Happy Income

By Jenya Rose

Don’t get me wrong; I love Jonathan Chevreau’s information. I greatly respect the path he is sharing with us to become “findependent” long before retirement. As an investment advisor at the beginning of my career, I’ve been surrounded by charts and graphs showing how starting investing in your 20’s is the best way to use compounding interest to create a massive nest egg. And how every year that you wait your chances of amassing anything decent wane.

This fills me with dread and regret. Dread and regret! Looking at these charts does more harm than good to me. And I know I’m not alone. We are a very self-involved culture; and when we learn new information we immediately relate it to our own life. How do these graphs relate to me? They tell me, “You screwed up bigtime.”

Bubble picI’m forty-something and had a very privileged
childhood.
From private school to boarding school to college I never thought about money or what anything cost. I spent my summers traveling, never had a summer job, and by 21 I had been to every continent except Antarctica and Australia. I felt jaded. All I did was shop and party. I remember saying, “I’ve done it all.” I feared that the rest of my life held nothing but a monotonous rich girl’s Groundhog Day. That was far from the truth.

An inheritance carried me through the rest of my 20’s while I flipped houses and worked on a few half masters degrees. I met my fabulous husband, who was in the same boat mentally at the time. We floated along adding more degrees and certifications to our higher learning (nothing particularly business or money-driven; we studied acupuncture, meditation, yoga, archetypal psychotherapy, art).

We flipped a house in Austin and moved to California and this time we did things differently: we didn’t by another house. Instead we decided to put the money into a business – a yoga studio – how could we go wrong? Famous last words. Knowing nothing about business, taxes, accounting, marketing – we have been under a mountain of debt for a decade now and have learned more lessons the hard way than we ever thought possible.

After that sustained level of suffering I decided to take a tax course to see what all the hoopla was about. Fascinating stuff! I’ve been a tax preparer ever since. I started my own tax business 2 years ago, am still hanging by a thread financially, still with a mountain of debt, but I’m thrilled to go to work in the morning! Retire? I think not. I’ve just now figured it out. The thought that I would only do this for the next 25 years and retire at 65 is a nightmare. I want to be chatting with clients and enjoying the puzzle of tax returns until I can’t lift my body out of bed in the morning.

So I got a late start. And I think a lot of other people are in the same boat. I’m not convinced that it is a generation X experience. I believe there are many people that are “middle-aged” (if we’re still calling it that) who are just getting a late start to living a passionate work life. Maybe they had a job in their past life and they quit that job to follow a dream (with or without adequate savings). And now they are bombarded with age-based charts of how much money they need for this old-timey “retirement” thing and they are filled with dread. Wake up people! You are in a different class, you are the happy income people!

Cab456ac24084abI call it happy income. Income derived from something you are passionate about and that you can see yourself doing until you can’t do anything anymore. Most people have unhappy income. They hate their job, the people they work with; or they’re just bored to tears. You can tell who the unhappy income people are: they are the ones with #TGIF all over their social media, and an “I hate Mondays” sign in their office with the image of Garfield or another cat looking disgruntled. This is not us!

We are the happy income people. We may not have much of a financial portfolio, but we have a “life portfolio” that we are currently enjoying the crap out of. 70 is the new 30 – just ask my mom. She is 78 and spends her days running around like a chicken with her head cut off looking for things to do. She started a career in acting at 55 and, if you know any actors, they have a lot of free time in between auditions. The “retirement” concept of yesteryear is outdated and needs to be put to sleep.

If you are long in the tooth and feel like you’re just starting out financially don’t stress. When you read articles on millennials who are already financially independent, just know that you are in a class of people that has taken a different path. Yes, debt sucks. Yes, watching the bull market and knowing you could have made a bunch of money sucks. Yes, looking at your classmates/former colleagues facebook pics of extravagant vacations and new summer homes sucks. But if you could take a pic of your “sustainable happy income situation” I believe they would look at that pic longingly (in secret of course).

If you’re keeping your head above water and building something that you care about you are in an enviable position. Because happy income is forever.

* This was my first post, but there is more to come re: the less traveled path of happy income. Hopefully each of our unique journeys can help us to tread uncommon financial paths with less worry that we’ve fallen behind. :)

 

 

 

What Jason Zweig reads … and why

jasonzweig
Jason Zweig (Amazon.com)

The dean of personal finance writers in the United States, if not the world, is the Wall Street Journal’s Jason Zweig. In a recent instalment of his personal blog, Zweig presents many of the financial books that have influenced him and that he recommends. They include both financial books and non-financial books, which is quite consistent with the philosophy underlying this site (the Financial Independence Hub).

Several of the titles, but not all, are also in my own library. Below I list some of Zweig’s picks. All titles in red are live links to their respective listings at Amazon.com:

Financial:

Where are the Customers’ Yachts?

The Money Game

Against the Gods

A Random Walk Down Wall Street

The Intelligent Investor (on my shelf too, introduction is by Jason Zweig himself)

And finally, Zweig says, “Anything Bill Bernstein Writes.”

Since I have most of Bernstein’s books, here they all are. Take your pick, but I list them from top to bottom in the order I’d recommend reading them:

The Four Pillars of Investing

The Intelligent Asset Allocator

The Investor’s Manifesto

If You Can: How Millennials Can Get Rich Slowly

Rational Expectations: Asset Allocation For Investing Adults (a series)

Non-Financial:

Montaigne’s Essays

Skeptical Essays (Bernard Russell)

How to Lie with Statistics

How to access 75 more recommended financial books

By the way, my own recently published Kindle e-book, A Novel Approach to Financial Independence (U.S. edition), contains a long list of many of the books in my own library. At the end is a bibliography called A Peek into Theo’s Kindle (Theo is one of the financial advisor characters in the novel). It lists roughly 75 books I recommend, ranging from Inspirational to Investing, Retirement and Entrepreneurship. As above, most of the titles include live links to the actual Kindle titles at Amazon.

The one-page guide to Findependence

grs_titleConsidering that I once put an entire financial plan into a single tweet, it shouldn’t be too surprising that there exists a one-page guide to Financial Independence.

This one-page guide to Financial Independence is from J.D. Roth’s Get Rich Slowly site. (naturally, I would call it the one-page guide to Findependence!) Naturally, the strategy revolves around that most basic premise of personal finance: live below your means and spend less than you earn: much much less. So that you can save much much more. Not just the modest 10 to 20% that most people shoot for in their IRAs or RRSPs: Roth suggests saving at least 50% of your income, and preferably up to 70%.

Extreme? Indeed, Roth calls it Extreme Saving but that’s also the kind of savings levels that     Extreme Early Retirement gurus like Mr. Money Moustache and Jacob Lund Fisker advocate. The latter’s book can be found here.

As per the philosophy of this site, I would call this Extreme Early Findependence, not Extreme Early Retirement, which is why we call one of our soon-to-launch discussion forums Extreme Early Findependence.

Affluent may qualify for GIS: key is large TFSAs

Good piece in Wednesday’s Financial Post by Morneau Shepell’s Fred Vettese about how even higher-income Canadians may be able to qualify for the Guaranteed Income Supplement to Old Age Security. Normally, those with big RRSPs fret about having OAS benefits clawed back and they don’t even think about the GIS.

But, as writers have been pointing out ever since the Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA, the Canadian equivalent of the U.S. Roth plans) started up in January 2009, a big benefit of the TFSA is that when you pull money out it’ s not only tax-free but also doesn’t result in clawbacks of either OAS or the GIS. Today, it’s common to see TFSAs with balances of $40,000 and in some cases much more. (See the annual MoneySense Great TFSA contest, where some of the “winners” have hundreds of thousands in them. Similar tales have been told in recent issues of the Financial Post.)

Consider that a dual-income couple could by now easily have between $80,000 and $100,000 in a TFSA, even if conservatively invested. Add another $11,000 between them in January 2015 and we’re talking real money.

Vettese’s article is the best I’ve seen even pointing this out. Put this into your “Decumulation” file!

Don’t call us robo-advisers, we deliver “light advice”

Cute Robot
DepositPhotos

Lots of ink for so-called robo-advisers in the press lately. With the unveiling of several new start-ups north of the border, this is a trend that won’t be stopping any time soon. One of the first pieces on it of which I’m aware was in the June 2014 issue of MoneySense, bearing the headline “Subscription-based Couch Potato.” I should know, since I wrote both the article and the headline.

Late in August, I wrote a piece on this for the Financial Post, and tried to make the case that “light advice” might be a better term since human advisers can and often do get involved in the process. “Light” suggests a half-way point between the “no advice” model of discount broker enthusiasts choosing their own ETFs, and the “full” advice model of full-commission stock brokers or investment counsellors or wrap programs that give plenty of human oversight, but also charge for it one way or another.

Dan Bortolotti of Canadian Couch Potato and PWL Capital also devoted his Index Investor column to robo-advisers in the fall issue of MoneySense. Dan sees plenty of benefits to them, one of them being lower investment costs, but another is that he believes they’ll force investment advisers (humans, that is) to do a better job.

Rob Carrick of the Globe has also weighed in as have, no doubt, a multitude of other personal finance writers and bloggers. In this September piece, Rob wrote that robo-advisers have arrived and “may be just what your portfolio needs.”

The past weekend, David Pett of the Financial Post wrote a good piece on the topic, with full portfolios generated for younger investors and retirees by four of the major Canadian robo-adviser — sorry, I meant light advice — firms.

And finally I wrote a piece on this today (Nov. 14) for the Investor Education Fund’s Getting Smarter About Money site.

I’d like to hear from new users of this model

I’ll certainly be doing more on this topic and would like to hear from readers who have actually used them. As a relatively new service, these early adopters presumably come from one of three camps: brand new money from those starting out in investing; those migrating “down” from higher-cost full-service brokerage, mutual funds, wrap programs or investment counsellors; and those migrating “up” from no-advice rock-bottom costs of choosing their own securities at a discount brokerage.

Presumably in the latter case, the investors have concluded they have done their portfolios a disservice by picking their own stocks, ETFs or sectors: I used to joke about “self-wrecked RRSPs.” For them, moving from no advice at all to “light” advice may be a compromise whereby they’re now willing to give up 1% or so in annual costs in return for some relative peace of mind about the big-picture topics of asset allocation, geographical and sector concentration, and rebalancing.

I’d welcome hearing from investors from any of these categories, although I doubt much new money has gone into these services yet. That may happen though, as lottery winners and those selling their businesses look for a home for a sudden infusion of cash.

If and when we get our commenting capability and discussion forums rolling, that would be one place to give us feedback. In the meantime, I welcome hearing the investor perspective from all three of the camps just mentioned: just email me at jonathan@findependenceday.com or @me at Twitter.

P.S. Have heard from several clients of Wealth Simple. How about clients from some of the other firms?